Staff augmentation vs an in-house dedicated team

Staff augmentation and outsourcing a specialized team of specialists are two of the most common approaches for working with a software supplier, according to industry experts.

In the case of staff augmentation, a software firm supplies its engineers in the form of external hires, often on a contract basis.


Both approaches place the onus on the service provider to find and hire qualified engineers.
The vendor additionally pays for the price of office space; software licensing; hardware and utilities; staff training and perks when outsourcing a dedicated team. This includes the overall well-being of programmers.

What’s on the surface in terms of staffing expenses is only the tip of the iceberg. The good news is that when done well, this endeavour increases employee loyalty and reduces staff churn. In the end, the outsourcer profits from a crew that is content, motivated, and well-trained.


Working and organizational culture are also vastly different under each of the two paradigms.

As a result of working together in the same office, an outsourced team may foster a culture of open communication and mutual support. If you’re looking for an environment where people are more engaged and supportive of one another, you’re going to be hard-pressed to find that under a staffing model.For their part, the software house takes care of their comfort of work, correct career development, and mentorship, as well as providing all the essential resources and bolstering the company’s culture. Because they know they’ll be moving on to another project at some point, staff augmentation engineers may not identify themselves with either of the parties involved. This is a common cause of dissatisfaction and might serve as a catalyst for looking for other work.


Despite the fact that the project is being produced by external employees, the outsourcer typically manages it inside in the staff augmentation model.

Hiring a dedicated team, on the other hand, necessitates the addition of a project manager, reducing the buyer’s involvement in project management while shifting complete project management responsibility to the vendor. Buyers want to deal with a single person, so that’s what they get.

You can focus on your core business and get cutting-edge outcomes if you outsource the design, construction, implementation, and maintenance of a comprehensive software solution.

Post Comment